CEOs Cannot Fix Performance Without Fixing Governance
Not so long ago I was speaking with a colleague about my project at the time. I explained we’d completed the structure design and now just had to finish governance and activate it so the proposed design would work as planned. Her response? “It’s always about governance in the end.” She’s not wrong.
Too often CEOs and executive teams treat organisation design as a structural exercise: redraw the chart, rename a few roles, remove some poor performers and hope performance improves. It rarely does in a sustainable way. Organisation design succeeds or fails on three disciplines that are often underdone: governance, decision rights and KPIs. If these are unclear, the business does not become agile or accountable; it becomes political, slow and expensive. The problem is not usually strategy. It is the absence of operating clarity.
Governance is not corporate bureaucracy. It is the system that determines what gets discussed, what gets decided and, just as importantly, what gets ignored. When governance is weak, organisations confuse activity with progress and meetings with leadership. Executive teams then spend too much time on the wrong issues and not enough on the decisions that actually shape risk, performance and execution. Good governance creates clarity on forums, escalation, accountability and decision pathways, allowing leaders to stay focused on what matters most.
Decision rights are where most organisation designs quietly fail. If nobody knows who has the authority to decide, decisions do not disappear; they get delayed, escalated or made by the loudest voice in the room. That is not collaboration. It is dysfunction with better branding. And for CEOs and executive teams, decision rights should be particularly explicit in the areas that cut across the business: capital investment, product development, customer insights, risk, acquisitions, and so on. Ambiguity here is not harmless. It creates drag, weakens accountability and compounds execution risk.
KPIs are the final test of whether the design works. Yet many executive teams are still flooded with metrics that measure motion rather than outcomes. If the KPI set is bloated, static or disconnected from strategic priorities, it does not improve governance; it obscures it. Strong KPI design forces an organisation to be honest about what matters, what success looks like and where intervention is needed. A good dashboard should sharpen judgment, not numb it.
The hard truth is this: an organisation chart does not run a business. Governance does. Decision rights do. KPIs do. CEOs and executive teams that fail to get these right should not be surprised when strategy stalls and accountability evaporates. Good organisation design is not an HR exercise or a governance side issue. It is a leadership discipline, and in a volatile environment, it is one of the clearest sources of competitive advantage.
Steve Giles is the Founder of Giles Associates, bringing over 25 years of global experience in organisational design, operating model transformation, and leadership alignment across the US and APAC. He partners with leadership teams to create clarity, structure, and performance in complex, growth-focused organisations.
About Giles Associates
Giles Associates partners with investor-backed and growth-focused organisations to design operating models, leadership structures, and ways of working that drive clarity, alignment, and long-term performance. We combine deep global consulting experience with the agility and personal attention of a boutique advisory firm-delivering hands-on, tailored support directly from senior practitioners.
Work with us
If you’re looking to improve organisational performance, align leadership, or design a more effective operating model, we’d welcome the conversation.
